(Bengali speakers and readers worldwide are now celebrating the birth centenary of Sukanta Bhattacharya, arguably West Bengal's most beloved and widely read, recited and remembered revolutionary poet who had died even before he turned 21, just three months before independence and the accompanying partition of Bengal and India. Three of Sukanta's poems were set to music shortly after independence by Salil Chowdhury, one of the all time greats of modern Indian music, whose birth centenary was observed on 19 November 2025. They were sung by Hemanta Mukhopadhyay, (known as Hemant Kumar in the world of Hindi music) and became classics of the progressive cultural movement and heritage of Bengal. The Sukanta-Salil-Hemanta convergence returned again in the turbulent 1970s with one more poem turned into an unforgettable melody. Liberation pays tribute to these giants of progressive culture by revisiting the magic created by the Sukanta-Salil-Hemanta convergence. The article has been written by Souvik Ghoshal, a member of the editorial board of Deshbrati, the Bengali weekly organ of CPI(ML).  -Ed.)

1 

Revolutions are remembered through manifestos, prison diaries, martyrdoms and mass uprisings. Yet no political movement secures a lasting place in public memory by ideas alone. Ideas survive only when they acquire an emotional vocabulary- when they become stories, images, rituals and songs. Every enduring political tradition eventually discovers that while ideology may persuade the intellect, music inhabits memory. Long after organisations fragment, programmes are revised and slogans lose their urgency, songs continue to travel across generations, carrying fragments of a historical imagination into times radically different from those that produced them. 

Few examples in modern South Asian cultural history illustrate this truth more compellingly than the four songs that brought together the poetry of Sukanta Bhattacharya, the music of Salil Chowdhury and the voice of Hemanta Mukhopadhyay. Abak Prithibi (1950), Bidroho Aaj (1950), Runner (1951) and, after an interval of nearly two decades, Thikana (1970), are often remembered simply as memorable songs based on Sukanta's poems. That description, though accurate, remains profoundly inadequate. These four works constitute something much larger: one of the most successful attempts in Indian cultural history to transform Marxist political consciousness into enduring artistic form.

Their achievement lies precisely in the fact that they never sound like political instruction.

The history of revolutionary art is filled with works that became prisoners of their own ideological certainty. Across the twentieth century, countless poems, songs and plays were written in the name of socialism, anti-fascism or national liberation. Many served their immediate political purpose with distinction; very few survived as independent artistic achievements. Once the historical moment passed, their rhetoric often remained while their aesthetic vitality faded. The collaboration between Sukanta, Salil and Hemanta belongs to an altogether different tradition. These songs refuse the familiar opposition between artistic excellence and political commitment. Instead, they demonstrate that, under certain historical conditions, each can deepen the other.

Understanding this remarkable convergence requires returning to Bengal in the 1940s. The decade transformed not merely the political landscape but the very meaning of culture. The Bengal Famine of 1943 exposed the catastrophic violence of colonial political economy. Anti-fascist mobilisation linked local struggles with global conflicts. Peasant movements, workers' strikes and the Tebhaga movement challenged entrenched structures of power. Independence arrived, but accompanied by Partition, displacement and communal violence. Hope and catastrophe entered history simultaneously.

For artists, neutrality became increasingly impossible.

Literature, theatre, painting and music were compelled to confront questions they had rarely faced with such urgency. What is the responsibility of art during famine? Can beauty remain detached from hunger? Is the artist merely an observer, or also a participant in history? Such questions were not unique to Bengal. Similar debates animated European anti-fascist movements, Soviet artistic circles and Latin American revolutionary culture. Yet Bengal produced its own distinctive answers.

The Communist Party of India became one of the principal sites where these questions acquired organised cultural expression. Whatever one may think today of the Party's political successes or failures, its contribution to twentieth-century Indian cultural life remains extraordinary. It recognised earlier than most political organisations that class struggle was not confined to factories, fields or legislatures. It also unfolded within language, literature, theatre, cinema and music. Culture was understood neither as decorative entertainment nor as a secondary activity, but as a terrain where ideology itself was produced, contested and transformed.

This understanding found its most influential institutional expression in the Indian People's Theatre Association—IPTA. IPTA occupies a unique position in the cultural history of modern India because it attempted something unprecedented. It sought to dissolve the conventional distinction between elite culture and popular culture without sacrificing artistic ambition. Folk traditions, urban modernity, political theatre, poetry, classical influences and international musical idioms were brought into conversation with one another. Songs were expected to be sung collectively, yet they were not artistically simplistic. Theatre addressed immediate political crises, yet aspired to lasting dramatic value. The movement insisted that political commitment need not imply aesthetic impoverishment.

It was within this intellectual climate that Salil Chowdhury emerged. Salil is frequently described as a composer, lyricist or music director. All these descriptions are true but insufficient. He was, perhaps more fundamentally, a musical thinker. Few twentieth-century Indian composers possessed such an unusually wide musical imagination. Bengali folk idioms, Baul traditions, Western classical harmony, Soviet mass songs, Eastern European choral writing, jazz harmonisation and modern orchestration all entered his compositional vocabulary. Yet these influences never appeared as quotations. They were absorbed into a coherent musical language uniquely his own. His Marxism shaped not merely the subjects he chose but the structure of his music itself.

This is an observation that deserves greater attention than it usually receives. Political commitment in Salil's work is often discussed only at the level of lyrics. Yet his compositional practice also reflects a profoundly dialectical imagination. Contrasting melodic ideas coexist rather than eliminate one another. Harmonic movement generates tension before resolution. Individual instrumental voices retain relative independence while contributing to collective unity. The music itself often embodies relationships between individuality and collectivity that parallel the political ideals informing his worldview.

Such observations should not be mistaken for deterministic claims. Music is never reducible to ideology. Yet in Salil's finest works, political consciousness and musical architecture repeatedly illuminate one another.

If Salil represented Marxism through musical form, Sukanta Bhattacharya represented it through poetic language.

Sukanta's place in Bengali literature is paradoxical. He died before reaching the age of twenty-two, leaving behind a body of work remarkably small in quantity yet astonishingly expansive in influence. He is routinely introduced as "the revolutionary poet," a description that has become so familiar that it often prevents closer reading. The label emphasises ideology while obscuring poetry.

Sukanta was revolutionary not because he wrote about revolution, but because he transformed the imaginative possibilities of Bengali political poetry. His achievement becomes clearer when situated within the larger history of modern Bengali literature. Rabindranath Tagore explored the moral and spiritual autonomy of the individual. Kazi Nazrul Islam infused poetry with rebellion, cosmopolitanism and anti-colonial energy. Jibanananda Das created an intensely interior modernity, discovering metaphysical solitude within everyday landscapes. Sukanta inherited all these traditions while redirecting poetic attention towards historical materiality.

Bread, factories, labour, hunger, smoke, machines, workers, children, streets—these are not merely subjects in Sukanta's poetry. They become categories through which history itself is imagined. Perhaps nowhere is this more evident than in his treatment of hunger. Earlier literature often approached hunger as individual suffering deserving sympathy. Sukanta transforms hunger into political knowledge. Starvation ceases to be accidental misfortune; it becomes evidence of a historical system. The famous declaration that poetry becomes inadequate before bread has sometimes been interpreted as a rejection of literature. It is, in fact, exactly the opposite. Sukanta demands a poetry capable of confronting material reality without aesthetic evasion.

His Marxism therefore never appears as external doctrine imposed upon experience. It emerges organically from lived history. This explains why Salil found Sukanta so congenial. The composer did not discover ready-made songs inside Sukanta's poems. What he discovered instead were dramatic structures awaiting musical interpretation. Every poem already contained movement, conflict, rhythm and emotional architecture. Salil's task was neither to decorate the verse nor to simplify it for popular consumption. His task was considerably more difficult: to translate poetic dialectics into musical dialectics. That distinction is fundamental.

Setting a poem to music always involves interpretation. The composer must decide where emphasis belongs, where silence acquires meaning, how melodic ascent transforms verbal expectation, whether rhythm should follow speech or challenge it, how orchestration expands emotional perspective, and how the human voice mediates between language and melody. Every such decision constitutes criticism as much as composition.

Salil therefore reads Sukanta as carefully as any literary critic.

He discovers musical possibilities hidden within syntax, metaphor and cadence. Sometimes he intensifies emotional tension already present in the poem. Sometimes he deliberately restrains it. Sometimes orchestral texture reveals layers of meaning that remain implicit in the written text. The result is not illustration but reinterpretation.

This is why describing these works simply as "songs based on Sukanta's poems" misses their historical importance. They represent a rare dialogue between two artists working within a shared political imagination but through entirely different artistic languages.

Only one element remained necessary before that dialogue could enter public memory.

It required a voice capable of carrying intellectual complexity without rhetorical excess; a voice that could embody political conviction without sacrificing emotional subtlety; a voice simultaneously intimate and collective.

That voice belonged to Hemanta Mukhopadhyay. 

2 

If Sukanta supplied the political imagination and Salil Chowdhury the musical architecture, the four songs themselves became the laboratory in which poetry was transformed into sound. They reveal a composer who never treated music as a decorative accompaniment to literature. Nor did he regard poetry as sacred text that must remain untouched. Every setting is a reinterpretation. Salil reads Sukanta not as a passive admirer but as a fellow artist who enters into conversation with the poem, discovering within it rhythms, tensions and emotional trajectories that the printed page only partially reveals.

The first of these collaborations, Abak Prithibi, is perhaps the least declamatory and therefore, paradoxically, among the most politically sophisticated. The title itself announces astonishment. But Sukanta's astonishment is neither romantic wonder nor existential bewilderment. It arises from confronting a world structured by contradiction. Beauty coexists with brutality, abundance with starvation, hope with despair. The poem refuses to simplify reality into either optimism or pessimism. Instead, it inhabits contradiction. That instinct is profoundly dialectical. The world is not static; it is a field of opposing historical forces.

A less imaginative composer might have interpreted the poem primarily as one of melancholy. Salil hears something different. He hears thought in motion. Consequently, the melody avoids excessive sentimentality. It unfolds through long lyrical arcs that resist easy emotional closure. Instead of seeking immediate resolution, musical phrases frequently extend beyond the listener's expectation, creating a feeling of suspended reflection. The tune appears to think aloud.

Equally significant is Salil's harmonic language. Bengali modern songs of the period generally remained rooted in relatively straightforward tonal movement. Salil, by contrast, often introduces unexpected harmonic shifts that subtly alter the emotional colour without disturbing the melodic continuity. These changes never call attention to themselves; rather, they function like changes in intellectual perspective. As the poem moves from one image to another, the harmony quietly reorganises the emotional landscape.

This compositional method mirrors Sukanta's poetic technique. His images rarely remain isolated. One image generates another, each enlarging the historical horizon of the previous one. Salil achieves an analogous effect through harmony. Musical space continually expands beneath the melody, allowing philosophical reflection to acquire emotional depth.

Rhythm, too, deserves attention. Abak Prithibi does not proceed through the relentless pulse associated with many political songs. Instead, its rhythm breathes. Moments of motion alternate with moments of repose. This flexibility preserves the contemplative quality of the poem while preventing it from becoming static.
The orchestration demonstrates another characteristic feature of Salil's mature style.

Instrumental passages are never mere interludes. They function structurally. Brief orchestral responses frequently complete thoughts left suspended by the vocal line. In Western musicological language, one might describe these passages as forms of commentary rather than accompaniment. They extend the semantic field of the text.
Such sophistication explains why the song continues to reward repeated listening. One discovers not simply a memorable melody but a carefully constructed musical argument.

The relationship between words and melody deserves particular emphasis.

Salil rarely forces Bengali speech into artificial rhythmic patterns. Instead, he allows the natural accentuation of the language to guide melodic movement. This respect for spoken cadence prevents the poem from losing its literary integrity after becoming a song. The listener never feels that the music dominates the words. Rather, language and melody appear to discover one another.

If Abak Prithibi is dialectical meditation, Bidroho Aaj is disciplined mobilisation.

The title promises rebellion, but Sukanta's rebellion differs markedly from romantic insurrection. It is not an explosion of individual anger. It is organised historical agency. The poem speaks not through isolated heroism but through collective determination. Revolution appears not as emotional catharsis but as historical necessity.
Salil immediately grasps this distinction.

Many revolutionary songs rely upon loudness to communicate political conviction. Salil rejects that temptation. He understands that confidence does not require theatrical exaggeration. Instead, he constructs musical momentum through rhythm.

The pulse is firm, deliberate and unmistakably forward-moving. It evokes marching, but without reducing the song to military rhetoric. The rhythm creates a sense of collective movement, suggesting people advancing together rather than individuals displaying courage. Politics here is choreographed through metre.

Melodically, ascending figures play an important structural role.

Repeated upward movement generates expectation. Yet Salil carefully avoids allowing these ascents to become predictable. Climactic moments are balanced by passages of restraint. Emotional intensity is therefore accumulated rather than continuously displayed.

This dynamic economy reflects one of Salil's greatest strengths as a composer.

He understood that permanent excitement quickly exhausts itself. Genuine dramatic power depends upon contrast. Crescendos acquire meaning only because quieter passages prepare them. In Bidroho Aaj, the alternation between restraint and assertion mirrors the discipline essential to any organised political movement.

The orchestration reinforces this impression. Rather than overwhelming the vocal line, instrumental textures frequently widen the sense of collective space. One almost hears individuals gathering into a larger historical community. Musical density increases not for spectacle but for solidarity.

There is also a subtle relationship between text and melodic contour.

Sukanta's poetry possesses an inherently muscular syntax. Sentences frequently propel themselves forward through cumulative energy. Salil responds by avoiding fragmented melodic design. Instead, he constructs extended phrases whose momentum parallels the syntactic movement of the poem itself. Speech becomes song without surrendering its argumentative force.

This capacity to preserve intellectual coherence within musical expression distinguishes Salil from many of his contemporaries.

Political songs often simplify language to facilitate collective singing. Salil moves in the opposite direction. He trusts listeners with complexity. His compositions invite participation without demanding simplification.

By the time Runner appeared in 1951, the creative partnership between Sukanta's poetry and Salil's musical imagination had reached remarkable maturity.

Few poems in modern Bengali literature have entered popular consciousness as completely as Runner. Yet its popularity has occasionally obscured its artistic complexity.
The runner is not merely a messenger. He is history in motion. The figure occupies an extraordinary symbolic position. Anonymous, tireless and perpetually moving, he links scattered human lives without ever becoming the centre of attention himself. He carries messages, but his own story remains largely invisible. Sukanta thereby elevates an ordinary worker into the protagonist of historical change.

This is deeply consistent with Marxist historical thought.

History is not made primarily by celebrated individuals but by innumerable anonymous labouring people whose collective activity sustains society. The runner becomes an emblem of precisely such historical agency.

Salil recognises this immediately.

Instead of approaching the poem as descriptive narrative, he translates movement itself into musical structure.

From the opening measures, rhythmic propulsion dominates the composition. The beat rarely settles into comfortable equilibrium. Forward motion becomes almost irresistible. Importantly, this is not merely onomatopoeic imitation of running footsteps. Had Salil simply imitated physical movement, the song would quickly have become repetitive.

Instead, he creates what might be called historical momentum.

Every phrase appears to push the next phrase forward. Cadences frequently avoid complete closure, encouraging continuous motion. Musical expectation remains active. Even moments of temporary repose seem less like conclusions than brief pauses before renewed movement. The melody reflects this same principle. 

Wide intervals are used with remarkable economy. Rather than indulging in virtuosity, Salil shapes the vocal line around purposeful movement. The tune feels energetic without becoming acrobatic. This restraint allows the narrative force of the poem to remain central. 

Perhaps the most striking feature of Runner is the relationship between individual voice and collective imagination. 

Although a single singer narrates the journey, the music continually suggests a social world extending beyond the individual performer. Instrumental writing broadens the acoustic horizon. The listener senses villages, roads, fields, distances and communities that remain invisible but emotionally present.

This cinematic quality became one of Salil's defining characteristics. 

Long before background scoring became central to Indian cinema, he was already thinking orchestrally. Music creates space. Geography becomes audible.

There is another reason why Runner occupies such a distinctive position within Bengali political music.

Unlike many revolutionary songs that celebrate leaders or movements, Runner celebrates labour itself.

Its hero possesses neither fame nor authority. He possesses endurance. That shift is politically significant.

By making an ordinary worker the moral centre of the composition, Sukanta and Salil together redefine heroism. Historical dignity belongs not to spectacular power but to necessary labour. In that respect, Runner remains one of the most profound artistic representations of working-class subjectivity in modern Bengali culture.

Yet the transformation of these poems into enduring public memory depended upon something beyond poetry and composition. It depended upon a voice capable of embodying both intimacy and history.

That voice was Hemanta Mukhopadhyay.

3 

When Salil Chowdhury returned to Sukanta Bhattacharya in 1970 to compose Thikana, Bengal was no longer the Bengal of 1950. Two decades had altered the political landscape beyond recognition. Independence had lost much of its emancipatory promise. The Tebhaga movement belonged to history. The Communist movement itself had undergone ideological debates, organisational splits and strategic realignments. The food movement had shaken West Bengal. Naxalbari had exploded into the political imagination. State repression had become a daily reality. The optimism of the late 1940s had given way to a far more complex emotional climate, where hope survived, but no longer in innocence. This historical distance matters.

Thikana should not be heard simply as another Sukanta setting after a long interval. It is, in many ways, Salil's return to Sukanta through the accumulated experiences of two turbulent decades. The composer who approached Sukanta in 1950 and the composer who revisited him in 1970 were the same individual, but not the same historical subject. Between those two moments lay political victories, ideological disappointments, artistic maturity and exile from certainties that once appeared unshakeable.

That history quietly enters the music. The word thikana—an address, a destination, a place of belonging—is itself profoundly suggestive. Sukanta's poetry repeatedly imagines movement rather than arrival. The search for a just society is never completed; it remains an unfinished historical project. Salil's setting preserves precisely this sense of incompletion. Unlike the assertive momentum of Bidroho Aaj or the relentless propulsion of Runner, Thikana moves with measured introspection. The melody seems less interested in proclaiming than in searching.

This change is not ideological retreat. It is political maturity.

Every historical movement eventually confronts the distance between aspiration and reality. Revolutionary hope survives, but it acquires memory. Confidence learns self-criticism. Certainty becomes reflection. Salil's composition captures this altered emotional landscape with remarkable restraint. Musically, Thikana demonstrates the confidence of a composer who no longer needs dramatic gestures to achieve expressive depth.

The melodic design is economical. Individual phrases breathe naturally, often ending with subtle openness rather than emphatic closure. Harmonic progression quietly expands emotional resonance without drawing attention to itself. The orchestration is carefully judged, leaving sufficient acoustic space for the words to retain their philosophical gravity. Silence plays an unusually important role.

Pauses are not absences but moments of thought. One hears not hesitation but contemplation. The music trusts listeners to inhabit emotional ambiguity without demanding immediate resolution.

That trust distinguishes Salil from many composers of political music. 

4

To evaluate the Sukanta-Salil-Hemanta convergence today merely as historical artifacts of post-independence Bengali culture is to miss their ongoing political life. In an era characterized by hyper-capitalist alienation, the erosion of labor rights, authoritarian populism, and the rise of divisive identity politics, these four songs remain startlingly urgent. The structural crises that Sukanta diagnosed in the 1940s have not disappeared; they have mutated into modern forms.

The gig economy worker, the food delivery agent navigating urban highways at night, and the migrant laborer walking thousands of miles across state borders are the direct contemporary counterparts of Sukanta’s postal runner. The song’s critique of invisible, hyper-exploited labor rings even truer in the age of algorithmic capital.

As global wealth concentrates in fewer hands while millions face climate displacement, poverty, and war, the child's shock at entering a world defined by hunger remains an accurate diagnosis of global capitalism.

In an era where political dissent is routinely criminalized and state propaganda seeks to homogenize public thought, the martial, uncompromising call of "Bidroho Aaj" acts as a vital cultural defense against political apathy.

In a contemporary world defined by refugee crises, statelessness, and forced migrations, the quest for a "Thikana" (an address/a place of belonging) transcends its original 1970 context to become a universal anthem for marginalized populations everywhere.

The political journal of today must recognize that culture is not an ornament of political movement, but its heartbeat. The Sukanta-Salil-Hemanta convergence demonstrates that when radical political theory, structural musical innovation, and popular vocal artistry align, they create a cultural force capable of surviving the decay of political parties and changing geopolitical landscapes.

These songs do not belong to archives or nostalgia. They remain active, unyielding manifestos set to music—waiting to be sung whenever the people march again.

Matchstick

-- Sukanta Bhattacharya

(Poem Translation from Bangla by Amitendu Bhattacharya, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, India. Asiatic, Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2020)

I’m a tiny matchstick.
So insignificant, perhaps I’m not even noticed.
Still, remember:
My face is fat with gunpowder,
An intense desire to be afire rules my heart.
I’m a matchstick.

Just the other day a commotion was created.
Do you remember? A blaze started
In the corner of the house for dropping me
Disdainfully, without putting me out?
So many houses I’ve burnt down,
So many palaces I’ve reduced to dust.
Singlehanded, I did. A tiny matchstick.

Likewise, we can devastate
Vast swathes of land.
Will you still treat us with contempt?
Don’t you recall the day
When we were all aflame inside a matchbox?
You were startled – we heard
The wails from your contorted faces.

Limitless is our power: you have sensed it
Over and over. And yet, why don’t you understand?
We won’t be contained in your pockets.
We will break free, will go in all directions:
To towns, marketplaces, and hamlets,
From one horizon to another.

We burn repeatedly due to utter neglect –
This you know all too well
What you don’t know is
When we will conflagrate together
For one last time.